Skip to main content

My letter to Noam Chomsky

[Also published on View Point, Rising Kashmir]

Greetings, Prof. Chomsky!

I have been an ardent devotee to your works, have read a number of your books, listened to dozens of your interviews, and, I also adore your passion for Libertarian Socialism. I must say that your intellect is soaked in clarity, precision and your views are very insightful regarding neo-imperialism, states as power centers promoting repression, evils of capitalism, authoritarianism and so on. You have commented on a wide range of conflicts, be it East Timor, Palestine, hideous regimes in Romania, Indonesia, US sponsored terrorism in Turkey and Columbia, to name a few. As a student and avid listener of your works, I want to suggest that you broaden your expertise in South Asian politics by commenting readily on the grave and outstanding dispute of Kashmir - the blood dyed place between India and Pakistan, which has seen a grievous conflict since 63 years.

We live in a society of political contradictions, religious fanaticism, fascist leaning approaches from both India and Pakistan in dealing with our societal/political crises; the present youth is in an identity crises. Our administration acts through the barrel of a gun. International human rights organisations are not allowed to probe thousands of deaths and rapes properly. The Indian media is riddled in favoritism and prejudice. Both countries are ruined in conflicting bilateralism.'Intifada' has shifted from Palestine to Kashmir. We don't know where we belong, India, Pakistan or Kashmir. We aren't even allowed to protest, if a youth falls on street by a free flowing bullet. My city, Srinagar, has been a city of pallbearers, massacres and mourning for some time now. I would be delighted if you refer to Kashmir, whenever you discourse on conflicts and their resolutions.

If we talk of American policies regarding Kashmir, they have been very selfish and two folded. The former Presidents of America have deliberately kept themselves ignorant of our issue. The reigning President, Barack Obama, in his election campaigns, promised a mediator for Kashmir, alongside vice - president Joe Biden, but the world witnessed how this President of yours dodged his promises just for the sake of international commerce, during his last glossy and lavish visit to India. It is quite evident that capitalism and globalization, unjustly dictates over politics, in a world in which we live today.

I would just love if you would take my suggestion. After-all, you would do a service to humanity. There's nothing more righteous than that. I wish you a long life and even more success in the years to come.

God bless you.

Thanking you in anticipation,
Naveed Qazi

By way of Noam Chomsky, reply:

Thanks for writing. It’s been on my mind for a long time. I’ve brought it up in talks, in India too. In fact last time I was there what I said led to a BJP demonstration and the police insisted on police protection the rest of the time I was travelling in India. But I haven’t written about it – or a great many other things that I’m urged to write about, and that are extremely important. Just physical limits, always requires very hard judgment calls.

Noam Chomsky

e-mail sent from

Popular posts from this blog

Kashmir's Geo-Strategic Position

Also published on viewpoint, Rising Kashmir

Kashmir is gifted with strategic leverages for emerging nations. That’s why, it’s is a vale of caged aspirations. The current geo strategic position for Kashmir is dictated by three emerging nations, which are bred with Secular, Islamic and Communist ideologies.
Kashmir is a mountainous valley and is surrounded by a hilly and mountainous terrain. The land of Jammu, Muzafarabad, Gilgit, Baltistan and Ladakh constitute an area of highlands. They border Pakistan, Afghanistan, Xinjiang, and some parts of Chinese administered Tibet. Kashmir also has proximity to Central Asian Republics. With the nature of increased arm strengths developed by India, Pakistan and China, the geo strategic position of Jammu and Kashmir continues to get importance.
Throughout history, all the political changes that have occurred outside of Kashmir, have had a direct strategic impact on the territorial integrity. The wars of foreigners throughout centuries intensified th…

Scanning The Dixon Plan

Sir Owen Dixon was a judge from the Australian High Court, whose meticulous report drafted to UN in 1950 received a commendation for the obstinacy of his analysis of the Kashmir resolution from the Security Council. He is regarded as an Australian scholar of impeccable credentials. 

Infact Major William Alan Reid, who was an observer with the U.N Military Observers Group in  Kashmir (UNMOGIP) got inspired by his work for his B.A Honours thesis titled “Sir Owen Dixons Mediation of the Kashmir Dispute” (July 2000) for which the writer is greatly indebted.  Reid is currently working on the doctoral thesis for the same subject. He has even consulted his notes, some of his fifty interviews, his diary and personal correspondence as well as the Australian archives, besides other published works.  To add more facts, there has been a tradition of Australian scholarship on India represented by Professors like Robin J Moore, Ian Coplan and B. Millar to name a few. 
Academia studying Kashmir confl…

Calling Off Kashmir Dispute

There has been no transparency in discussions arising from bilateral talks on Kashmir. From the last few years, calling off the Kashmir dispute has been the favourite argument arising out of Indian media commentators and political leaders. It is because of existing narration of implanting fervent Indian nationalism inside Kashmir valley.
Economic development, financial incentives and being part of India’s GDP growth have been other reasons given to call off Kashmir dispute. But is it fair? Why did India and Pakistan make attempts to reconcile through international agreements in the past at the first place, despite several wars fought on the borders?
British research has also deemed instrument of accession controversial. Importantly, what makes India run away from its moral responsibility when thousands of innocent civilians have been killed in the conflict? When were economic grants more sacrosanct than human lives? Maybe, when it comes to Kashmir, all humanist ideals, which Indian poli…