Skip to main content

A Month Of Melancholy


(Picture taken from Outlook Magazine)

[Also published on south Indian journal, Counter Currents]

[Also published on The Muslim Institute London]
http://musliminstitute.org/article.php?id=3499




It has been more than a month’s restriction in Kashmir. I’m writing in the morning, whilst birds chirping that melodic twitter, sedating tranquility. The frogs have stopped croaking. There is a flash of white on the grass. The sky is painted morning blue, and I can feel a cool breeze piercing my window, as I try to jot through my faculty of thinking.

About nineteen natives have been killed since the past month. It included young children and youth. It also included women and men, who were the lynchpins of their family. For us, life would move on, but for their sorrowing families, the struggle has just started. Kashmiri mornings are full of causerie, but will their mornings be peaceful? It would start with a suffocating silence which wouldn’t end till the night. Pain. Misery. Melancholy. Suffering; would be ruling their minds and hearts, and it won’t cleanse away easily.

Who knows how many times, those grievers would have cornered themselves, in that acute misery, murmuring sobs, hoping that their lost ones would return, but dead never return. They never come back. It’s hard to regain their presence. Not in this life, at-least. May God help them.

As days go by, the script of Kashmir’s misery reads like this – A school kid becomes a corpse, is one of the youngest tenants of the martyr’s graveyard. A woman, muttering through her window, observing a violent protest, down her alley, catches death with a haplessly fired canister. A youth goes to shop bakery, gets chased for life, a bullet pierces his flesh in front of his family, with a buzzing hiss. Protests gather momentum, bloodbath makes more kills. Mass media is banished to dump the truth. Pallbearers are assaulted for being pallbearers. Flag marches remind us of fascism in an unpolished democracy. Lowly compensations are granted to accept a dreadful fate. Is this a fair script for us? It has resulted in an ugly unrest with wailing mothers and hungry kids deprived of their mothers.
People stone-pelt due to deep anger and frustration. It's not an organised strategy. After throwing each lump of stone, they don't feel helpless. Their anger and frustrations should be resolved, and it shouldn't be glorified by these leaders, to avoid causalities of death, for the sake of peace and an effective resolution.


People have died on streets and their bodies have fallen, yet again. Still, the most common contradiction spread by Indian media is that the conflict economics is the root of the dispute. Economic stagnation can never substitute the cost of human rights abuse. Human dignity values much more than that. It’s victor in comparison. No Kashmiri would believe that economic packages would heal the suffering of Kashmiris. That would be further punitive. Kashmiris fight for identity. We want a long lasting political solution. Peace can be given by giving social justice and not by giving economic justice.

A phased dialogue, involving leaders, from all strands of political thought, is the need of the hour to restore peace in Kashmir. I do agree, its not right to emancipate any kind of violence, including stone pelting, but one has to resolve to adjudicate their anger & frustration, so that they wont feel relieved after throwing every lump of stone. Also, hapless leadership of National Conference is a party to their choler, because they have failed to address the grievances of the people, by not reaching out to them.

Indian influence came to Kashmir in phased stages, annexed by historic designs of National Conference. Right from independent Kashmir, to greater autonomy, to full exercise of the Indian constitution. All things which cant be morally justified, are ought to be not justified. Demilitarization, even giving 'greater or regional autonomy', to Kashmiris, will kick start the resolution. The concept of autonomy is rooted in Indian constitution. However, I believe, its not the final solution by any means, but it will surely initiate the resolution.

Very recently, there have been noises coming from New Delhi governing chambers, regarding the dilution of AFSPA, the most draconian law unleashed by the Indian Parliament, functional in Kashmir and in the North-East. This much hated law allows military personnels to kill with impunity, without any fear of a court trial - which if initiated, needs to have a permission from the central government to debrief or declare the offenders guilty. That's the reason, countless cases have been left unresolved. It has also been vexedly refuted by top human right protectionist bodies. I hope these noises become constructive, without getting adulterated with competing claims and political differences.

Hartaals and curfews are self-erosive and they will yield absolutely nothing, till some constructive efforts by the separatist main-stream, are initiated, with the support of New Delhi, Indian civil society & Kashmiri local administration; Pakistan also has a critical role to play.

The basic basis of our struggle are rooted in liberty and sovereignty of our land. People who believe in this, belong from different strata of our society, with different approaches to the struggle; our ways of protests would be different, but the right of self-determination is critical for emancipating our struggle, and this is the most kernel thought, completely valid and acceptable, under international norms. This natural association will always bind the leaders, people of our land together, for that cherished dream of freedom. It will serve as a tribute to all Kashmiris who died for Kashmir, whatever their ideology was, and a long lasting peace, perhaps, would be the biggest tribute to them.

That's why people should propose their hard-earned learning curves towards the future and enter collectively into a process of visionary introspection i.e to bring out an evolutionary model for an independent Kashmir.

© Naveed Qazi, Insights: Kashmir


Popular posts from this blog

Kashmir's Geo-Strategic Position

Also published on viewpoint, Rising Kashmir

Kashmir is gifted with strategic leverages for emerging nations. That’s why, it’s is a vale of caged aspirations. The current geo strategic position for Kashmir is dictated by three emerging nations, which are bred with Secular, Islamic and Communist ideologies.
Kashmir is a mountainous valley and is surrounded by a hilly and mountainous terrain. The land of Jammu, Muzafarabad, Gilgit, Baltistan and Ladakh constitute an area of highlands. They border Pakistan, Afghanistan, Xinjiang, and some parts of Chinese administered Tibet. Kashmir also has proximity to Central Asian Republics. With the nature of increased arm strengths developed by India, Pakistan and China, the geo strategic position of Jammu and Kashmir continues to get importance.
Throughout history, all the political changes that have occurred outside of Kashmir, have had a direct strategic impact on the territorial integrity. The wars of foreigners throughout centuries intensified th…

Scanning The Dixon Plan

Sir Owen Dixon was a judge from the Australian High Court, whose meticulous report drafted to UN in 1950 received a commendation for the obstinacy of his analysis of the Kashmir resolution from the Security Council. He is regarded as an Australian scholar of impeccable credentials. 

Infact Major William Alan Reid, who was an observer with the U.N Military Observers Group in  Kashmir (UNMOGIP) got inspired by his work for his B.A Honours thesis titled “Sir Owen Dixons Mediation of the Kashmir Dispute” (July 2000) for which the writer is greatly indebted.  Reid is currently working on the doctoral thesis for the same subject. He has even consulted his notes, some of his fifty interviews, his diary and personal correspondence as well as the Australian archives, besides other published works.  To add more facts, there has been a tradition of Australian scholarship on India represented by Professors like Robin J Moore, Ian Coplan and B. Millar to name a few. 
Academia studying Kashmir confl…

Calling Off Kashmir Dispute

There has been no transparency in discussions arising from bilateral talks on Kashmir. From the last few years, calling off the Kashmir dispute has been the favourite argument arising out of Indian media commentators and political leaders. It is because of existing narration of implanting fervent Indian nationalism inside Kashmir valley.
Economic development, financial incentives and being part of India’s GDP growth have been other reasons given to call off Kashmir dispute. But is it fair? Why did India and Pakistan make attempts to reconcile through international agreements in the past at the first place, despite several wars fought on the borders?
British research has also deemed instrument of accession controversial. Importantly, what makes India run away from its moral responsibility when thousands of innocent civilians have been killed in the conflict? When were economic grants more sacrosanct than human lives? Maybe, when it comes to Kashmir, all humanist ideals, which Indian poli…