Skip to main content

K- Resolution


Excerpts appeared on Counter Currents
http://www.countercurrents.org/qazi080611.htm


1) Kashmiri society is based on pluralism, harmony and tolerance. Those people who are trying to project the freedom struggle as an extremist, fundamentalist struggle are halting the resolution process. This very notion proves to be the biggest flaw in the Kashmir resolution.

2) Unless and until, common Kashmiris are not made part of the resolution, no such resolution is valid or can be accepted under any circumstances. India & Pakistan have to revere the sacrifices rendered by the people of Kashmir; Till then no such resolution can take place because it would be against the existing social persuasions.

3) A joint commission of some kind, having negotiants from India, Pakistan and Kashmir can help in institutionalization of decommissioning of Jehadi groups through proper negotiations and phased demilitarization of army, initiated together, from both sides. It can significantly restore peace in the region.

4) After every act of violence, both countries should learn to initiate Confidence Building Measures (CBM'S), identify the grassroots of the conflict, instead of nurturing visions of destruction for each other. The perceptions of common man from both countries still haven't changed. It has only helped in impeding the K-resolution instead of its facilitation.

5) LOC (Line of Control) should be dismantled. The common masses can prosper through mutual economic dependence. People can come close, live together, and it can result in overcoming the emotional barrier which Kashmiris have faced since decades.

6)Delay tactics in initializing the resolution may favor both countries but it is a serious drawback to Kashmiris. Both countries are committed in keeping the claim of other part alive. There is no mutual co-existence between the two parts of Kashmir. After decades of armed struggle, wars, loss of life and property, the resolution is still in the process of accommodation.

7) The resolution should be stringently Kashmir-centric. The two parts of Kashmir should enjoy a greater autonomy, and stress should be profoundly given on territorial integrity. It would not only ease off the never ending mutual distrust between the two neighbors, but would also give Kashmiris a long needed chance to represent their own aspirations.

8) The most important concern, still subsisting, among the masses in Kashmir is still the same : End of HR violations. Thousands of people have been slaughtered, missing & women have been raped. There has been a failure in delivering justice. Most of these abuses have been tainted as serious international crimes by international humanitarian bodies. Installation of a United Nations Truth Commission can act as a record institution for such savage abuses and it can prove beneficial in restoring the social fabric of Kashmir by proper rehabilitation of victims of violence.

The Resolution in Kashmir is vital for long lasting peace in the South Asia region. It has been a nuclear flash-point for many years, so its resolution is highly critical. The solution depends on the will to resolve and leadership efficiency. Sound Indo-Pak relations depend upon the effectual resolution of the K-issue. It has been in the world spotlight, since the partition of two countries. So, all the world powers like Britain and other EU countries want this issue to be settled once for all.


© Naveed Qazi, Insights: Kashmir

Popular posts from this blog

Kashmir's Geo-Strategic Position

Also published on viewpoint, Rising Kashmir

Kashmir is gifted with strategic leverages for emerging nations. That’s why, it’s is a vale of caged aspirations. The current geo strategic position for Kashmir is dictated by three emerging nations, which are bred with Secular, Islamic and Communist ideologies.
Kashmir is a mountainous valley and is surrounded by a hilly and mountainous terrain. The land of Jammu, Muzafarabad, Gilgit, Baltistan and Ladakh constitute an area of highlands. They border Pakistan, Afghanistan, Xinjiang, and some parts of Chinese administered Tibet. Kashmir also has proximity to Central Asian Republics. With the nature of increased arm strengths developed by India, Pakistan and China, the geo strategic position of Jammu and Kashmir continues to get importance.
Throughout history, all the political changes that have occurred outside of Kashmir, have had a direct strategic impact on the territorial integrity. The wars of foreigners throughout centuries intensified th…

Scanning The Dixon Plan

Sir Owen Dixon was a judge from the Australian High Court, whose meticulous report drafted to UN in 1950 received a commendation for the obstinacy of his analysis of the Kashmir resolution from the Security Council. He is regarded as an Australian scholar of impeccable credentials. 

Infact Major William Alan Reid, who was an observer with the U.N Military Observers Group in  Kashmir (UNMOGIP) got inspired by his work for his B.A Honours thesis titled “Sir Owen Dixons Mediation of the Kashmir Dispute” (July 2000) for which the writer is greatly indebted.  Reid is currently working on the doctoral thesis for the same subject. He has even consulted his notes, some of his fifty interviews, his diary and personal correspondence as well as the Australian archives, besides other published works.  To add more facts, there has been a tradition of Australian scholarship on India represented by Professors like Robin J Moore, Ian Coplan and B. Millar to name a few. 
Academia studying Kashmir confl…

Calling Off Kashmir Dispute

There has been no transparency in discussions arising from bilateral talks on Kashmir. From the last few years, calling off the Kashmir dispute has been the favourite argument arising out of Indian media commentators and political leaders. It is because of existing narration of implanting fervent Indian nationalism inside Kashmir valley.
Economic development, financial incentives and being part of India’s GDP growth have been other reasons given to call off Kashmir dispute. But is it fair? Why did India and Pakistan make attempts to reconcile through international agreements in the past at the first place, despite several wars fought on the borders?
British research has also deemed instrument of accession controversial. Importantly, what makes India run away from its moral responsibility when thousands of innocent civilians have been killed in the conflict? When were economic grants more sacrosanct than human lives? Maybe, when it comes to Kashmir, all humanist ideals, which Indian poli…